The ultimate goals of Bridge to Life include:

  • serving individuals with physical and/or communication impairments from birth through adulthood, locally, nationally and globally 
  • providing professional development opportunities in our areas of expertise 
  • contracting with families, agencies and school districts to offer direct services to students with severe physical impairments and complex communication needs

Save the Dates for Spring 2025!
Conversation Series on CVI and AAC with Dr. Christine Roman Lantzy

Browse Programs @The Bridge School

Webinar 9: Effective Interaction Strategies for Children with CVI and CCN

CVI@The Bridge School

Adapted AAC-CVI Framework – Adapted from work at Penn State University

Latest Events CVI@The Bridge School

2023 Summer Workshop – Addressing the Needs of Students with Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI) and Complex Communication Needs (CCN) in the Classroom Setting.

The Bridge School is excited to announce the AAC-CVI Framework, adapted from work at Penn State University.

Student Considerations

At the core of every adaption is the student.  By looking at the CVI characteristics of our students we determined how best to address their individual vision needs. Which includes:

  • Complexity – Reducing complexity of the background array (both in the broader environment and for viewing individual targets)
  • Distance Viewing
  • Novelty
  • Light
  • Movement
  • Color Preference
  • Field Preference
  • Latency
Reducing visual clutter in the broader environment.
Reducing complexity of background for individual items.
Reducing complexity of objects (1-3 colors).
Including color preferences in objects (particularly red, yellow, and/or blue).
Presenting novel objects by including color preferences.
Talking about the salient features of the item.
Presenting materials in the students’ field preference.
Using light and movement to attract visual attention.
Giving students the length of time needed to view the item (latency).
Placing materials at the distance necessary to expect visual fixation.

Environmental Considerations

  • Classroom space
  • Desk space
  • Noise levels
  • Lighting

With these characteristics in mind we looked at our pretend play and art areas.  It was clear we needed to reduce the visual complexity of the areas so that students could more easily find, interpret and know the areas of the classroom as well as the toys, props and objects included in each area as they relate to the theme.

Adaptations included:

  • Reducing the complexity of the environmental array so that key areas of the classroom could be found and identified.
  • Reducing complexity by adding black backgrounds to student wheelchair trays.
This is what we started with in terms of our pretend play area during service station theme. The play area is a wash of colors and shapes. It is difficult to find and differentiate the toys and props. We needed a way to make at least some of these props visually stand out against a complex background. We needed a way for our students to have visual access to new and familiar toys to engage within a pretend play schema, while also keeping a wide array of toys and objects available for use during play.
In order to pull out some props from such a complex background, we set up a black tri-fold board and used Velcro to attach the props. The black board blocks out the visual clutter from the rest of the pretend play area and is placed prominently in the room, in the same spot everyday.
Props pulled for the grocery store theme.
How the grocery store theme board looks in comparison to the pretend play environment.
Another way in which we reduced environmental complexity was to provide students with black backgrounds on their wheelchair trays. This tray is clear and when the toy car is placed on it the environmental complexity comes through.
Here the car is placed on a black tray and now the environmental clutter is blocked out in this visual field. This tray is made out of a black material and was ordered from the vendor in black.
Other ways to make the tray black include using Velcro to place back material under the tray or, as in this case, where a parent made a black cover to go over the tray.
This student uses a bookstand with a light as an easel. The light is clipped to the top of the bookstand and turned on to help draw visual attention to the activity. The stand can be easily adjusted and angled to place materials within a student’s preferred visual field. Given our student’s physical needs some assistance from a teacher may be needed. This teacher provides hand under hand assistance so the student can see and feel the art materials on his hands without her hand interfering in his visual field or experience. Here he is splashing water on his drawing to make the colors run together.

Teacher Considerations

  • Materials
  • Instructional strategies
  • Prompting language
  • Lesson planning

As a staff we began to understand the importance of having the expectation that a student will look at objects given appropriate adaptations.  With this in mind we set about mostly adapting the objects around each Center’s thematic unit and discussed how we would introduce novel objects.  We wanted to support the expectation of looking but balance that with the need for a young learner to also just actively do and experience something.

Adaptions included:

  • Using objects that were 1-3 colors
  • Using objects that contained at least one preferred color
  • Labeling objects with their visual salient features so staff consistently describes new objects to students
  • Black felt boards to present objects against
  • Flashlights to shine light as needed to attract visual attention towards an object
  • Providing sufficient quiet wait time to allow the student time to visually orient towards an object
  • Placing objects within a student’s preferred visual field and within an appropriate distance
Toys pulled onto the prop board were mostly 1-3 colors to address the need for reduced complexity in objects. Toys that had a student’s color preference in it were also used (e.g., blue wrench).
The salient features, or most obvious visual characteristics of the object, were written on a label placed on the back of the object. This helped staff consistently describe novel objects to students as they visually processed the item. Not all objects in our pretend play area had a salient features label, but the ones on the prop board all did. As time progressed we, as a staff, became more consistent in our labeling of salient features even on items that did not have a label.
While talking about the salient features of an object or presenting an object to a student, staff placed it on a black felt board to reduce the complexity of the visual array and help draw a student’s visual attention. Objects were placed within the student’s preferred visual fields and light and/or movement was used as needed to activate visual attention. The teacher provides the student with sufficient time to visually find the object before talking again.
Once an object is known, for some students the complexity of the visual array can increase. Here the student washes a stuffed dog (which is a single color) in a bowl of water. The overall visual schema continues to be simple, but she does not need a black tray or background to see the different materials.
This shovel has reflective properties through its shiny material. This reflective property mimics movement and helps draw the student’s visual attention to the object. Many toys and props needed no adaption to be visually appropriate, it was the job of the teachers to find the right ones that met the students’ visual needs.
These items are placed within the student’s preferred visual field. With a gray tray to reduce environmental complexity, a single-color measuring cup, and bowl of white flour, the visual scene is simple. The shiny bowl placed in his left visual field attracts his attention with its reflective properties. The student is able to find and hold the cup of flour and put it in the shiny gray bowl.
The fall tree is placed within the student’s preferred visual field and distance. It contains about 3 colors.
Art tools are presented against a black background with a light as needed to attract a student’s visual attention towards the item before expecting them to hold and utilize the materials.
A student’s favorite color is incorporated into an art activity. The bookstand art easel was adjusted and angled to match his visual field preference. For students art is not about the final product, but rather the process and the experience of using different art tools. Utilizing vision helps aid in understanding this process.
This student brings his head forward to help come even visually closer to his drawing.

AAC and AT

  • AAC system development (no-tech, low-tech, high-tech)
  • Vocabulary
  • AT tools (switches, seating, mounting, etc.)

In addition to their personalized AAC systems, students are able to express meaningful choices, make comments, ask questions and generally initiate conversations within Center’s activities by utilizing the objects to communicate more information.  For some students, we take a picture of the object and incorporate that icon within their AAC system.  With the pretend play and art areas more visually highlighted, students can utilize their vision to look towards that area to communicate a choice on where to go, make a comment, ask a question or initiate a conversation.

This student looks towards the car in the pretend play area to initiate a conversation with her teacher. She wanted to pretend to wash the car.